- Visit Us
- Happening Now
- Contact Us
All Saints is moving slowly into the 21st century. You can now make a gift to the church electronically through our secure online giving portal. Just head to AllSaintsSacramento.org/onlinegiving to make a contribution.
For years, figuring out a daily prayer practice for my family was something that I wanted to do, but I kept on stalling. Bedtime was already so long, and so often we were getting our children into bed later than I wanted to: did I really want to add a routine with candle-lighting, prayers, and so on?
Then, as my children transitioned from toddler to school-age, I worried that they might reject whatever I would come up with, just because. As double Priest’s Kids, (my husband is also an Episcopal priest), they already get a lot of religion anyway.
But still it nagged at me. I wanted a time at the end of the day that we could all come together, be aware that we are in the presence of God, and pray.
Finally I gathered up my courage to try something new. During Advent, I was encouraging members of my parish to pray the office of Compline. I figured that, what with the recent unsettling that followed the election, and the fact of Advent being a time for intentionally quieting ourselves and preparing ourselves to welcome Christ again, we could all use a little more intentional prayer. Compline is a beautiful service from the Book of Common Prayer, and while it can be made elaborate, it is very simple at its heart.
I created a handout that took the service of Compline and included a few sidebars with information about how to pray the service alone (it feels strange to say “The Lord be with you. And also with you.” when you are by yourself, but it’s okay). I taught a short class to a few people who showed up after church, and I distributed my Compline handouts to every group that met in the evening in the church, to use at the end of their time together. I left extra handouts out for people to pick up, and I announced in church that they were available.
Then, I took a deep breath, and brought five of them home with me.
I was pleasantly surprised at how easily my boys accepted the addition of Compline to our bedtime routine. With everyone ready for bed, we read a story as usual, and then put the story aside and gave a Compline handout to everyone who wanted one (two of my children are readers, the third not yet).
Our first night, I took the role of Officiant. Our second night, my husband was the Officiant. I assumed that we would trade off like that, but in a few days, our oldest son (11) asked if he could officiate! Brothers being what they are, the next night our middle son (9) asked to officiate.
Since then, our choice of officiant rotates around among all the readers of our family, depending on who volunteers and who has done it more recently. Our youngest usually sits curled up on my lap, and he has memorized all the words–even the psalms! In fact, after the officiating competition, the older two then competed in memorizing as well, and now they both refuse to take the handout unless they are officiating.
I love sharing prayer time with my family right before bed. I love that they are gradually becoming steeped in the beautiful language of the psalms and prayers of Compline. And the thing I love most is that they often take the opportunity in Compline to offer their own prayers or thanksgivings. They pray for people they know who are sick, or give thanks for their day. Our youngest often prays for the homeless or for the poor.
They are each developing their own spiritual life and relationship with God, and my prayer is that it will help support them throughout their lives.
Ash Wednesday is on March 1st, and All Saints will offer two worship services, one at noon and the other at 7pm. Both services will include imposition of ashes and Eucharist. Childcare is available at both services, and, as always, children are also welcome in worship.
September 11 was a day for looking back, but also, after Sunday worshipers had gone home, for looking forward. The vestry and clergy of All Saints met for almost five hours, sustained by sushi (courtesy of Sandra Takagi), caprese sandwiches (courtesy of Doni Blumenstock), a variety of coffee-flavored hard candies (courtesy of Paula Ostrom), and, not least, by the Holy Spirit.
I (Betsey) designed and led the retreat, using tools from our diocesan College for Congregational Development. We spent time considering the purpose and work of every congregation, which can be summarized as:
We also looked carefully at the ways that All Saints does these things, and spent the most time thinking about the many opportunities for transformation and spiritual growth that we offer at All Saints.
You may remember a time two years ago, after the vestry retreat of 2014. I like to think that the “trees” I drew then (some said that they looked more like a strange variety of seaweed) were memorable artistic depictions of the work of the vestry retreat. We had discerned the four roots, or core values, of All Saints:
Building on this work of discerning our roots, and looking at the ways that All Saints currently offers opportunities for spiritual growth and transformation, the clergy and vestry at our retreat this year created an area of focus for our work as we move forward. That area is:
As you can see, we really combined two areas within one, but we felt that it was important to do so. First, we at All Saints need to learn to be more fully who we are (see root #3!), especially who we are in our particular Episcopal/Anglican branch of Christianity (see root #4!). The leadership of All Saints believes that the world has a great need of what the Episcopal Church has to offer, and in order for us to offer it, we at All Saints need to know it well and live it in our own congregational life. Then our task will become learning how to share who we are with those who are seeking, and learning how to invite and incorporate people more effectively into our common life (see roots #1 and 2!).
The clergy and vestry envision a time in the future when All Saints becomes known in the community as the place to go for education in the Gospel and for spiritual growth; when we are more intentional with invitation and incorporation of new members; and when opportunities for robust exploration of the Gospel and of our Episcopal/Anglican faith and tradition are abundant in our congregation.
We are excited about the future that we believe that God is leading us into. Please share your ideas and enthusiasm as we move forward together!
The Church in Times of Trouble
All Saint’s will hold a Forum/Bible Study/Discussion beginning
11:30 am on Sunday, September 18 (after the 10 am service). It will be a chance to learn, think about and discuss the role of the church and of the individual Christian, in issues of justice and politics. It will continue for at least four Sundays until October 9. A summary of the topic is below:
There are some things that we know, and some things that we think we know. First, we know that Christianity is supposed to stand for justice. It is supposed to be on the side of the oppressed, the poor, and the outcast. We are supposed to love our neighbors, and even our enemies!
We also know that, in America at least, the Church must stay out of politics. We know that we are to accept people who have many different viewpoints. We know to “not judge lest we be judged.” We also know that there is some very bad history back there, times when the church interfered in politics, or was corrupted by politics, and became a vehicle for greed and lust for power, rather than Christ’s instrument in the world.
How are we to reconcile this? How do we navigate in a world that needs the message of Christ, where oppression, exploitation, violence, and injustice abound, while not becoming the tools of a particular political faction…or worse, adopting the methods of human power struggle ourselves? Read more
After the shootings in the gay nightclub in Orlando, all of us in Sacramento were appalled and embarrassed for our city when the national news began reporting on the hate-filled sermon by the self-styled “pastor” of Verity Baptist Church. This “church,” which is not affiliated with any other church or larger denomination, is in the north part of our own city, and dragged the name of Sacramento with it across the headlines in both traditional and social media. Hundreds of people showed up for a peaceful protest the following week, while we at All Saints were in church.
The Episcopal Church Whas affirmed the equality of LGBTQ people, their right to marry the person of their choice, and has taken stands to ensure that LGBTQ rights are protected by law. Still, it can be hard to know what to say when faced with someone who says “but I thought you believed in the Bible? Doesn’t it say in the Bible that homosexuality is a sin?”
Many people assume that the Bible does condemn homosexuality clearly and explicitly. And yet that is not true. When you really look at what the Bible says, and understand it in its own context and time in history, it becomes clear that the verses believed to condemn homosexuality are not talking about LGBTQ people as we understand them today. Because of this, and in response both to the attacks in Orlando and the hatred from Verity Baptist Church, I offered a Rector’s Forum on June 19th with the topic: “What the Bible really says about LGBTQ people.” What follows is the text of the handout that I gave to the people that attended. If you have further questions about this specifically or about Biblical interpretation in general, your clergy would love to talk with you!
Bible passages commonly used to condemn homosexuality
Genesis 19:1-26 (the destruction of Sodom)
Explanation: This story is the basis for the word “sodomite,” with the idea that the men of the city of Sodom wanted to have sex with the visiting angels (who were disguised, and no one knew that they were angels). This depends on an interpretation of “know,” as the men demand that Lot bring the visitors out so that they may “know” them. Some suggest that the men of the city simply wanted to make the acquaintance of the visiting strangers, but it is clear from Lot’s response (offering his two virgin daughters to the men of the city) that Lot understood that the men used “know” in the sexual sense. It is also clear in the story that this was not to be a gentle, loving sexual encounter but rather a gang rape of the two strangers who had come into the city and were being sheltered by Lot, who was also not a native of Sodom. The men of the city were likely seeking to assert their dominance over both the newly-arrived Lot and the visitors he sheltered. This proposed act of violence was an extreme violation of the duty of hospitality that anyone in that culture shared: to welcome strangers and keep them safe was of paramount importance.
Leviticus 18:22: King James Version “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” New Revised Standard Version “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.”
Explanation: This verse comes in a long list of verses describing various sexual liaisons that are forbidden, most of which we would agree are wrong (various forms of incest, sex with animals) and some that we would not believe are wrong (sex with a menstruating woman). The question to be resolved is the meaning of “abomination,” which in Hebrew is to’ebah. This word is best understood in this context as referring to ritual defilement. The laws in this list are all about the Jewish people maintaining the ritual purity necessary to separate them from the other cultures around them so that they can maintain their identity as a people. This is made very clear in verses 24 and following.
Leviticus 20:13: KJV “If man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.” NRSV “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them.”
Explanation: This verse is directly related to Lev. 18:22 and refers to punishment for those who have ritually defiled themselves and are therefore threatening the identity of the people of Israel. Again, it is made very clear later in the same chapter (verses 22 and following) where the dietary laws are also referenced.
Romans 1:26-27: KJV “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.” New International Version “Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.” NRSV “For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions. Their women exchanged natural intercourse for unnatural, and in the same way also the men, giving up natural intercourse with women, were consumed with passion for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the due penalty for their error.”
Explanation: Two things are important to note here. The first is the context: Paul is talking about what happened to people who did not honor God but instead worshiped idol statues. They knew better, but chose to be foolish, and so, according to Paul, God gave them up to “degrading passions” that violated the Jewish purity laws, which Paul knew were important to some of his readers in Rome. Paul’s intent is to condemn idolatry by pointing out the result of it. The second important thing to note is the word “natural.” It is easy for us in a heteronormative society to assume that in this context “natural” means “heterosexual.” This is a poor assumption. “Natural” here may mean “customary,” so as to refer to heterosexually oriented people engaging in same-sex sexual activity. Elsewhere, Paul uses this same word (“unnatural”) to refer to circumcision, men with long hair, and even an action that God takes. Since even God can be unnatural, clearly it is not morally wrong.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10: KJV “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.” NIV “Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” NRSV “Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers–none of these will inherit the kingdom of God.”
Explanation: The words translated “effeminate,” “male prostitutes,” and “abusers of themselves with mankind,” “homosexual offenders,” “sodomites,” are malakos and arsenokoites respectively. Malakos is best translated as “soft,” or “effeminate” particularly with reference to a boy kept as sexual partner to a man. “Male prostitute” is another appropriate translation. Arsenokoites is little attested and difficult to translate. The best translation is “male prostitutes,” according to L. William Countryman, Professor of New Testament Emeritus at Church Divinity School of the Pacific. Other scholars disagree on the translation, but it is clear that with so much disagreement, it is impossible to state with certainty what is meant.
1 Timothy 1:10: KJV “For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;” NIV “for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers–and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine” NRSV “fornicators, sodomites, slave traders, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to the sound teaching”
Explanation: The word translated “them that defile themselves with mankind,” “perverts,” and “sodomites” is arsenokoites, explained above.
“Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve”: This argument hinges on the two creation narratives in Genesis 1-2, in which the first two human beings are a man and a woman. They have children, and this is seen as the archetype that should govern intimate relationships. This can be refuted in two points:
Absence does not imply condemnation: Just because the Bible does not clearly present readers with a same-sex couple does not imply that the Bible is opposed to them. The Bible mentions dogs frequently, but not cats. Should we therefore conclude that the Bible condemns cats?
Procreation is not the only legitimate purpose for marriage: Even in the Bible, where procreation was important for survival in a way that it is not now, there are records of couples who do not have children. Certainly today both religious organizations and civil law recognize marriage whether or not the couple plans to have children or is even capable of having them.
How do we look at the Bible?
historical/critical: seeking to understand what Biblical writings would have meant to those in the time and place in which they were codified
literal: seeking to read the words and apply them directly to our circumstances and society today without reference to the original historical context
Translation issues: translators, like everyone else, are limited to working within the materials available to them (original manuscripts and ancient language scholarship) and the cultural context in which they live. In addition, some translators approach ancient texts with explicit agendas and beliefs.
What do we mean when we say “homosexuality”? In 2016, we talk about sexual orientation, with the clearly emerging understanding that gender identity and sexual orientation exist on a continuum that is far more fluid than was understood or acknowledged in previous generations. While we assume that LGBTQ people existed in Biblical times, the concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity did not exist as such. Marriage was focused on property, power, and procreation, not on the fulfillment of romantic love. The concept of homosexuality as we understand it today simply did not exist during Biblical times.
What is the overarching message of the Bible? The Bible contains stories, lists, genealogies, songs, and letters written and codified over many centuries. It provides a record of the people of Israel’s understanding of the way that God has acted in history, and of God’s faithfulness in upholding the covenant that God made with them. The Bible also provides a record of the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth and of the growth in belief of those who knew him and those who learned about him after his death, resurrection, and ascension that he was the son of God, the second person of the Trinity.
What was the heart of Jesus’ message? Jesus’ summary of the Law (the Torah) was that we should love God and love our neighbor. Jesus commanded his followers to love one another as he loved them. The first letter of John summarizes: God is love. (1 John 4:8b).
Positive examples of same-sex relationships in the Bible
David and Jonathan (1 Samuel), Ruth and Naomi (Ruth)
Explanation: These two pairs provide touching examples of emotionally intimate same-sex relationships. While there is no Biblical evidence that either pair had a sexual relationship, and in each pair at least one was married to at least one person of the opposite sex, both pairs declared love for one another and worked to ensure the welfare of each other.
For further reading:
Dirt, Greed, & Sex: Sexual Ethics in the New Testament and their Implications for Today by L. William Countryman, Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1988
Clobbering “Biblical” Gay Bashing by Mark Sandlin, published on October 11, 2011, on the web at http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thegodarticle/2011/10/clobbering-biblical-gay-bashing/
1 of 4
All Saints Episcopal Church
2076 Sutterville Road
Sacramento, California 95822
8:00 am Sunday Holy Eucharist, Rite II
9:15 am Sunday Adult Bible Study
10:00 am Sunday Holy Eucharist, Rite II
Nursery and Sunday School at the 10 am service.
All Saints Church is located across the street from Sacramento City College. Each semester we offer students the opportunity to purchase a pass to park in our parking lot Monday through Friday from 7:00 to 4:00. For more information see our parking pass information page.
Jesus is like your mother. She knew what was best, what was right for you, but it took a shift in your point of view to be able to recognize that.
We come into today’s gospel passage in the middle of a scene. Jesus is telling his disciples some of the things that he thinks they should know before he leaves them, which he knows he is going to do. He talks about going to prepare a place for them, and then he says “And you know the way to the place where I am going.”
And Thomas, who is practical, says: “Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?”
But Jesus wasn’t talking about going through town to a new house. Jesus was talking about where he was really going, through death on the cross to resurrection and new life. And, as he so often does, Jesus answers Thomas’ question not the way Thomas expected it, but in the way that imparts what Jesus is trying to explain.
“I am the way, and the truth, and the life,” Jesus says, and I can almost hear Thomas protesting: “that’s not what I meant!”
But it is what Jesus meant, and it is our job to reorient ourselves and our understanding, to shift our point of view, so that what Jesus says makes sense.
The same is true with the last bit of this gospel reading. Jesus says, “I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If in my name you ask me for anything, I will do it.”
Well, every child who hears that and asks God in the name of Jesus for a pony knows that that just isn’t true. Where is my pony? But Jesus, you said you would do anything I asked in your name!
This place of disappointment is where we find the disciples on the road to Emmaus. Here they are, on Easter day, walking and talking about what’s happened; and Jesus walks with them, but they don’t know it’s him. So they tell him about the terrible things that have happened, and they say, “We had hoped he was the one to redeem Israel.” That is: he was their dream come true.
I was driving across the desert. It was night time, late July, and there was no sign of anyone else on the two-lane highway that was leading my family and me across Utah toward Colorado. There was a little moonlight: no street lights, no houses or businesses as we drove. It was that part of the drive when you are just pushing to make it to the night’s destination: later than we wanted it to be, ready to stop if we could, needing to push on the remaining miles down the road.